so-you-want-to-build-a-mobile-app.jpg

If I had a nickel for every time someone asked me to build them a mobile app… I’d probably have $3.

However, often times there is little to no budget or there is some promise of equity, profit-sharing, or revenue share, but those can’t pay the bills in the meantime so I often turn these million-dollar ideas down.

Luckily, with today’s technology, building a mobile app on your own may sound intimidating, but it’s absolutely possible to do on a small budget.

You have options ranging from no-code tools to fully coding it yourself. In this post, I will show you how to build an app for free or low-cost and outline the different approaches (from easiest to hardest).

Before You Start: App Stores, Domains, and Basics

First, consider a few basics you’ll need when launching an app.

Developer Accounts

To publish your app on the major app stores, you’ll need developer accounts. Google Play (Android) requires a one-time fee of $25 for a developer account. Apple App Store (iOS) requires $99 per year for their Apple Developer Program. These fees allow you to submit apps to the stores. (You can build and test apps on your own device for free, but to distribute to users via the official stores, these are mandatory.) If you’re only targeting one platform initially, you can just pay for that platform’s account.

Domain Name & SSL (if your app needs a backend or website)

Even though an app lives on phones, you might still need a domain name and SSL certificate in some cases. Why? Many apps require a backend server (for databases, user authentication, APIs) or at least a landing page website. If you have a server that your app talks to, a domain makes API endpoints easier (e.g. myapp.com/api) and an SSL certificate is crucial to secure the data (using HTTPS). Domain names are cheap (around $10/year on sites like Porkbun.com), and SSL can be obtained for free (Let’s Encrypt). If your app is entirely self-contained (like a calculator or game that stores data only on the device), you might not need a backend or domain at all. But it’s good to plan for this in case your app will have any online component.

Development Hardware/Software

The tools to build apps are generally free. For Android, you can use Android Studio (free IDE) on Windows, Mac, or Linux. For iOS, you’ll need a Mac computer to run Xcode (Apple’s free IDE) if you go the native route. There are also cloud-based builders (no-code platforms) that run in your browser. I’ll cover those next. Make sure you have a decent computer for development, and a test device or two (one for Android and one for iPhone or use emulators on your PC).

Now, let’s explore the pathways to building the app, from the easiest (no coding required) to the hardest (writing code from scratch).

Easiest: No-Code App Builders (Drag & Drop Solutions)

If you have zero coding experience, no-code app builders allow you to create a basic app through a visual interface. These are platforms that do the heavy lifting for you, you design the screens and define some simple logic, and they generate the app.

Key features of no-code builders:

  • Drag-and-drop editors for UI design (place buttons, text, images on screens).
  • Pre-built functionality blocks (for example, you select “login screen” or “database list” from templates).
  • Some offer the ability to publish directly to app stores or at least give you the app file (APK for Android, or IPA for iOS) to submit yourself.
  • Many operate on a freemium model, they might let you build for free, but charge for higher tier features, white-label (removing their branding), or publishing assistance.

Examples of No-Code App Builders:

  • Thunkable: A popular no-code platform where you can design cross-platform apps (the same project can be exported to Android and iOS). It has a free tier that lets you build and test apps (with some limitations like a Thunkable logo or limited projects). It uses a block-based programming model (similar to Scratch or MIT App Inventor) for adding logic, you connect puzzle pieces to define what happens on events like button clicks (no text coding needed).

  • Adalo: Another builder focused on making mobile and web apps without code. You can design screens visually and it provides components for common app features. The free plan allows building and previewing your app, but to publish to app stores you’ll need a paid plan.

  • Glide: Glide allows you to create apps from a Google Sheet! (pretty cool actually) It’s great for simple directory apps, inventories, etc. Basically, you design how the data in a spreadsheet should be presented as an app. It can produce both mobile apps (installable as Progressive Web Apps) and web apps. Free for basic use, with paid plans for custom domain or more rows of data.

  • MIT App Inventor / Kodular: MIT App Inventor is a long-standing free project mainly for Android apps (very beginner-friendly, using block programming; runs in your browser). Kodular is a more advanced spin-off of App Inventor with more features and a community, also free to start. These are excellent for learning and creating simple Android apps without coding.

Pros: No coding skills needed. You can have a simple app prototype in hours. Great for testing an app idea or building a small utility. Many offer free plans, so you can play around at no cost.

Cons: Limited flexibility. You are constrained by what features the platform supports. Complex, custom features might not be possible. Performance might be a bit slower than native code for very heavy apps. Also, if the platform charges for publishing, you might hit a paywall when you want to launch for real. And relying on a platform means if that service changes or shuts down, you’d need to rebuild elsewhere.

Use case: Use a no-code builder if you need an MVP (Minimum Viable Product) quickly or if your app is relatively simple (e.g., a basic info app, a simple calculator or content app, a prototype to show others). It’s the fastest way from idea to a working app.

Moderate: Low-Code or Cross-Platform Frameworks (Some Coding Required)

If you’re willing to do some coding but want to minimize duplicating work for different platforms, consider using a cross-platform framework or what some call “low-code” solutions. These still involve programming, but they often provide lots of pre-built components and allow you to deploy to multiple platforms from one codebase.

What does cross-platform mean? Instead of writing separate code for Android and iOS, you write one set of code and export native apps for each platform. This saves time and usually requires learning one primary language or framework.

Popular Cross-Platform Frameworks:

  • Flutter: An open-source UI toolkit by Google. You write code in the Dart language. Flutter is known for its fast performance (it compiles to native ARM code) and a rich set of pre-made widgets for beautiful design. You can create Android and iOS apps (and even web and desktop apps) from the same code. It’s free to use. The learning curve is moderate and you need to learn Dart (which is not hard if you have basic programming understanding) and Flutter’s way of building UI (everything is widgets). Flutter is great for highly custom UI and has a vibrant community with many packages (libraries) to add functionality.

  • React Native: A framework by Facebook (Meta) that lets you build native apps using JavaScript or TypeScript and the React library (commonly used for web). It bridges to native components under the hood. Many developers like React Native because you can use web development skills (if you know React for web, it’s an easy jump). It’s also free and has many plugins. Performance is generally good (not as fast as Flutter in some cases, but quite capable for most app types).

  • Microsoft MAUI / Xamarin: Xamarin has been around for a while (using C# language). Now evolving into .NET MAUI, it allows cross-platform development in C# for Android, iOS, Windows, etc. It’s another option if you come from a C#/.NET background. Free with Visual Studio Community.

  • Ionic with Capacitor: Ionic is a framework for building cross-platform apps with web technologies (HTML, CSS, JS) and then using Capacitor or Cordova to deploy as native apps. Essentially, you create a web app that runs inside a native wrapper. This is a bit more code-intense than no-code, but if you know basic web development, it’s easier than learning Java/Swift. Ionic apps can access native device features via plugins. The performance is decent for many app types (though heavy animations/games might not be ideal on purely web tech).

  • Low-Code Platforms: There are also enterprise-oriented low-code platforms (like Outsystems, Microsoft Power Apps, Mendix) these are usually not free, though, and target businesses. For an individual or small project, frameworks like Flutter or React Native are often the go-to “middle ground”, you still code, but you do it efficiently.

Pros: One codebase for multiple platforms saves time. Large community support and lots of libraries available. You have more flexibility than no-code (you’re actually writing code, so you can implement custom logic freely). You also avoid some limitations of no-code (e.g., you’re not stuck if the platform doesn’t support a feature, you can code it yourself or find a plugin).

Cons: You do need programming knowledge. It’s “moderate” difficulty but its easier than learning two completely different languages for iOS/Android, but you’ll still be writing and debugging code. Also, while cross-platform frameworks cover a vast range of needs, occasionally you might need to dive into platform-specific code for certain features, which means a bit of Android or iOS native knowledge can be helpful.

Costs: The frameworks themselves are free. You’ll spend mainly time. You’ll use free tools (VS Code or Android Studio, etc.). When you’re ready to publish, you’ll need the developer accounts as mentioned ($25 or $99). If you need a server or database for your app, that could introduce hosting costs (though you can start on free tiers… more on that later). Overall, this route can be done with minimal monetary cost; it’s more about the learning investment.

Hardest: Traditional Coding (Native Apps from Scratch)

The most advanced route is to build your app in the native languages and tools provided by the platform makers. This means writing separate code for Android and iOS (if you want your app on both).

  • Native Android: Use Java or Kotlin with Android Studio. Google now primarily supports Kotlin as the preferred language for Android development (it’s concise and modern, and interoperates with Java). You’ll design layouts in XML or Jetpack Compose (Android’s newer toolkit for building UI in code).

  • Native iOS: Use Swift (Apple’s modern language) or Objective-C (older, less common for new projects) with Xcode on a Mac. You create the UI with Storyboards/Interface Builder or SwiftUI (Apple’s newer Swift-based UI framework).

  • Other Platforms: If you were targeting an app for, say, Windows or Mac desktop, you’d have their native frameworks too, but let’s assume we’re focusing on mobile.

When to go native? Native development is typically chosen for very complex apps, high-performance needs (like cutting-edge 3D games or AR apps), or when you want to fully utilize platform-specific features with absolute control. It’s also common when an organization has separate teams for Android and iOS. For a solo developer or small team on a budget, going fully native on both platforms means learning two different tech stacks, which is quite time-consuming. However, you might choose to start with one platform natively e.g., build an Android app in Kotlin first (because maybe Android phones are more accessible to you), and worry about iOS later.

Pros: Maximum control and performance. You can utilize every native UI element and optimization. The apps can be as efficient as possible and you have the entire ecosystem of native tools at your disposal. There are also tons of resources because Android and iOS development are well-established fields.

Cons: Steep learning curve if you’re new. You effectively double your workload to support Android and iOS separately. Even within one platform, you have to manage a lot (app life cycle, compatibility with different OS versions/devices, etc.). Development can be slower compared to using high-level frameworks, because you handle many details manually. Also, for iOS, you need a Mac (which could be a significant expense if you don’t have one).

Cost: The programming tools (Android Studio, Xcode) are free. So the cost here is again mostly time, and the Apple $99/year account if doing iOS. If you don’t have a Mac and want to build for iOS, that hardware cost is a factor. Android development can be done on any decent PC. Recommendation: If you’re just starting out, going full native is likely overkill unless your app truly demands it. It’s the hardest path. But it’s good to be aware of it as many professional apps are built natively for quality reasons. You can always migrate or refactor to native later if your app grows huge.

Don’t Forget the Backend (Caching, Authentication, Databases)

No matter which method you choose to build the app’s interface, consider what supporting technology your app might need. Many apps aren’t just standalone… they connect to services or store data externally.

Backend Server

If your app requires users to log in, share data, or generally interact with content from outside the device, you’ll need a backend. This could be a server you build (using something like Node.js, Python (Django/Flask), Ruby on Rails, etc.) or a Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS) solution. Firebase: Firebase (by Google) is a popular BaaS that has a generous free tier. It provides authentication (users can sign in with email, Google, etc.), a real-time database and Firestore (flexible cloud databases), cloud functions (run server code without managing a server), and file storage. You can integrate Firebase into your app easily (it has SDKs for Android, iOS, web). This lets you add user login, data storage, and more without writing your own server from scratch.

Supabase, AWS Amplify, Backendless

These are alternatives to Firebase, offering similar services (Supabase is an open-source Firebase alternative using SQL database, AWS Amplify ties into Amazon Web Services). Some have free tiers to start as well. If you prefer full control, you can self-host your backend on a cheap server (like a $5/mo VPS) and create APIs that your app calls. That requires web development knowledge, but it’s an option if you want to learn or have specific needs. In that case, you’ll definitely use a custom domain and SSL for your API endpoints.

Database

Decide where data will live. If it’s user-specific and small, sometimes storing on the device is enough (each mobile OS has local storage options: Keychain/NSUserDefaults for small pieces of data on iOS, SharedPreferences on Android, or even a small SQLite database on the device). This is good for things like saving settings or caching recent content. But for anything that needs to be shared across users or devices, you’ll need a cloud database (again, something like Firebase Firestore or a hosted database on a server).

If using a no-code app builder, they often provide some built-in simple database or let you connect to something like Airtable or Google Sheets as a makeshift database.

For cross-platform frameworks or native, you’d integrate with an external DB via APIs or use a service’s SDK.

Authentication

If your app will have user accounts, consider using an existing auth service. For instance, Firebase Authentication can handle emails/passwords and social logins easily (and free). This saves you from the security headaches of implementing login yourself. Other services like Auth0 or AWS Cognito can also manage user identities. If you build your own backend, you might end up implementing JWT tokens or similar to manage sessions… doable, but using a ready solution can be faster and more secure initially.

Caching & Offline

Good apps often cache data so they’re not constantly re-fetching from the network. For example, if your app grabs a list of items from an API, you might save that list on the device (in a local database or file) so that if the user opens the app without internet or just for performance, you already have some data to show. Both Flutter and React Native have packages for local storage (like shared_preferences or SQLite packages). In native, you have Core Data or SQLite on iOS, Room or SQLite on Android. Plan to implement some caching if your app pulls data from the cloud, to improve user experience.

Testing and Iteration

As you add these pieces (backend, database, etc.), keep testing on real devices if possible. Catch issues early (e.g., network errors, slow queries) and tweak accordingly. Many backend services have dashboards where you can monitor usage and see if things are running smoothly.

Which Path Should You Choose?

So, to wrap things up, picking how to build your app really boils down to what you’re comfortable with and what your project needs. If you just want to quickly see your idea come to life or build something super simple, those no-code builders are your best friend. If you’re a bit techy or willing to learn some coding, going the cross-platform route with tools like Flutter or React Native lets you build for both iPhones and Androids at the same time, which is pretty neat. Now, if you need top-notch performance or really specific phone features, or if you already know the coding languages for Apple or Android, then going native is the way to go, even though it’s the most involved.

The best part? You don’t have to commit to one path forever. A lot of people start simple to test the waters and then level up their tech as their app grows.

You could even start with a basic version and then rebuild it with more powerful tools later on. And don’t forget about PWAs, they’re like websites that act like apps and can be a super cost-effective way to get your idea out there without all the app store hassle.

Ultimately, just choose what feels right for you now, and remember that things can always evolve!

Building an app for the first time is a learning journey. If you’re doing it on the cheap, then leverage all the free resources out there. Tons of tutorials, YouTube videos, and communities (Stack Overflow, Reddit r/learnprogramming, etc.) can help you when you get stuck.

Plan what your app should do at a high level, and choose the simplest method that can achieve that. If your app is basically informational or form-based, a no-code tool might suffice. If it’s interactive and you’re keen to learn coding, try Flutter or a similar framework.

Start small to get a basic version working. It’s better to have a simple working app than an ambitious project that never finishes. You can always add features and improve the app iteratively.

Use free tiers and trials! Most services (Firebase, etc.) have free tiers that will cover you during development and initial launch. Just keep an eye on usage so you don’t unexpectedly exceed limits as you grow.

Test on actual devices, even though emulators are fine, nothing beats trying the app on a real phone (or a few different phones if you can) to catch usability issues and performance on low-end hardware, etc. For iOS, you can use TestFlight (Apple’s beta testing system) to share with friends/testers before final App Store release; for Android, you can sideload the APK or use Google Play’s internal testing track.

Finally, don’t be afraid to ask for help on developer forums if you run into a tricky problem. The development community is very active and usually happy to help newcomers.

Good luck with building your app!

Whether you click it together with no code or grind through lines of Swift/Java, you’re taking steps to bring your idea to life. Keep learning, and enjoy the process of creation. It’s pretty rewarding to see your own app running on your phone. You got this!